I'm not back regularly, and will be busy with NaNoWriMo in particular for the next two weeks, but I wanted to have a discussion about something many writers will have to face once their story has been written, whether it takes a month or not, getting feedback to make it better.
I can't count how many articles I've read and interviews I've seen, heard or read where it's said at some point "Get second eyes on your writing." Not just for the technical stuff, which as important as it is, I really find it a pain sometimes, but also for things that don't work or should be removed, and often the case for me, doesn't make sense as currently written.
But how can you help others when you barely can help your own craft quirks and missteps ?
While many have told me you just have to say what I like and what I don't if I can't be technically helpful, I'm not simply talking about reading tastes and other subjective things like that. I just really don't feel I can help to the extent I was helped. It's one of the key reasons I had to leave my first critique group.
I was, and sadly still am, weak in the areas they excelled, so often I felt like if they had issues I'd never had or understood, how could I be helpful?
People can say "What X character did isn't convincing" until the cows come home, but knowing that, and even agreeing that is the case, doesn't mean finding a better way to do it just comes to you, and that's for critiquing others work and trying to edit and/or revise your own.
So in the comments I urge you to answer the following-
What's ONE did you learn from critiquing others writing that made your writing better?
Only one to really zero in on what the greatest takeaway for you is.
Together, let's try to take crisis out of critiquing others writing, and our own.
Ciao For Now,